Editorial Review Process 2026

Last Updated: April 13, 2026

NAD Plus Guide publishes educational, compliance-aware content designed to help readers understand NAD+, supplements, peptide topics, and broader wellness claims with more context and less hype. Our editorial goal is clarity, balance, and careful sourcing.

How we prepare content

Articles are drafted in plain English, checked for accuracy against publicly available authority sources where appropriate, and reviewed to remove overstated claims, dosage advice, supplier endorsements, and language that could be mistaken for personal medical guidance.

How we handle evidence

Not all health-related claims are supported by the same level of evidence. When research is early-stage, mixed, animal-based, or otherwise limited, we aim to say so clearly. We do not present uncertain outcomes as established medical fact.

What we link to

Where useful, we link readers to recognised public-health and regulatory sources, including the NHS and the MHRA, as well as relevant peer-reviewed literature and evidence summaries.

What we avoid

We do not publish personalised treatment advice, prescribing instructions, or supplier recommendations for therapies that require clinical supervision. Educational content on peptides or wellness products should not be interpreted as endorsement or as a substitute for professional care.

Readers should also review our Medical Disclaimer and About the Author and Review Standards page for more detail.